Hon'ble Justice Anjana Prakash dismissed the petitioner's application seeking quashing of C.J.M.'s order of cognizance in a police case, holding quashing was inappropriate due to disputed questions of fact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13658 of 2014 (2) dt.09-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13658 of 2014
Arising out of P.S. Case No. -164 Year- 2012 Thana -NAUTAN District- SIWAN =================================================== Brajesh Patel Son of Ramesh Patel Resident of Village- Thakur Ke Ramur, P.S.- Nautan, Dist Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Sheela Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J. Upadhyay (APP) ===================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
02. 09.10.2014 The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance dated 22.01.2014 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Nautan P.S. Case No. 164 of 2012.
Considering that the Petitioner seeks quashing on disputed questions of fact which can not be gone into at this stage, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
The application is dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-
U T
Brajesh Patel
The State of Bihar
ANJANA PRAKASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
