Dismissed

Alok Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Dec 2014CR. MISC./10671/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Patna High Court, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10671 of 2014, considered a petition for quashing an order allowing ad interim maintenance. Finding no merit in the application, the Court declined interference and directed the Family Court to conclude proceedings positively within three months.

What did the court decide?

The application for quashing was dismissed; the Court below was directed to conclude proceedings positively within three months.

Alok Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10671 of 2014

¶2

====================================================== 1. Alok Ranjan Son Of Vishnu Deo Thakur R/O Shri Raj Kunj Apartment, Block B, Flat No. 404, Road No 4, Mahesh Nagar, P.S. Krishnapuri, District Patna, Permanent Resident Of Village Rasalpur, P.S. Dumra, District Sitamarhi

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar

¶6

Poonam Kumari @ Poonam Devi wife of Alok Ranjan, resident of village Rasalpur, P.S. Dumra, District Sitamarhi and resident of Shri Raj Kunj Apartment, Block B, Flat No.404, Road No.4, Mahesh Nagar, P.S. Krishnapuri, Distt. Patna currently resident of daughter of Rajendra Thakur resident of village Surshand, Gram Panchayat Surshand East ward No.6, P.S. Surshand, District Sitamarhi

¶7

Aryan Kumar son of Alok Ranjan currently under the guardianship of Poonam Kumari @ Poonam Devi (both O.P. no.2 and 3 resident of village Rasalpur, P.S. Dumra, District Sitamarhi and resident of Shri Raj Kunj Apartment, Block B, Flat No.404, Road No.4, Mahesh Nagar, P.S. Krishnapuri, Distt. Patna currently resident of daughter of Rajendra Thakur resident of village Surshand, Gram Panchayat Surshand East ward No.6, P.S. Surshand, District Sitamarhi

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kr. Rakesh, APP

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 08-12-2014 The Petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 25.1.2014, by which Principal Judge, Family Court, Sitamarhi has allowed ad interim maintenance to private Opposite Parties in Misc. Case No.139 of 2012.

¶13

In the hope that there could be some compromise in the matter this Court had issued notice to the Opposite Party No.2 but no one appears on her behalf.

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10671 of 2014 (4) dt.08-12-2014

¶15

2/2

¶16

Considering the subject matter of the dispute, I am not

¶17

inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶18

The application is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to conclude the proceedings positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order without granting unnecessary adjournments to any party.

¶19

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶20

Narendra/U T

Alok Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alok Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra Srivastava Vs The State Of Bihar

Himanshu Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kumari Sudha and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mr. Amiya Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Gurmeet Singh @ Goldy Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ashish Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.