In a compromised case, the High Court set aside the entire proceeding, including the order of cognizance passed by the Judicial Magistrate in a complaint case.
The entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 26.4.2007 is set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10230 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3761 Year- 2006 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Mr. Amiya Kumar Sahu son of late Dhaneswar Sahu, working as Senior Manager (Legal), Bank of Baroda, Zonal Office, Bihar, Jharkhand & Orissa Zone, Anand Vihar, West Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001 .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shanti Devi wife of Sri Vashist Muni Singh, House No.5, Gokul Marg, North Srikrishnapuri, P.S. Krishnapuri, District Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Shankar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy, APP For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Binod Kr. Yadav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 6 08-12-2014 It is agreed by the parties that now the matter has been compromised. In view of such, the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 26.4.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Patna in Complaint case No.3761C of 2006 is hereby set aside.
Application stands allowed.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
U T
Amiya Kumar Sahu & Ors.
The State of Bihar
Shanti Devi
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
