seizure was made at 8 A.M., at Nautan police station but the F.I.R. was lodged at 6.45 P.M. at Baria police station. It has further been stated that the articles seized were neither weight nor sealed at the place of occurrence. It has further been contended that article seized by Officer-in-Charge, Nautan police station whereas F.I.R. lodged at Baria police station. Thereafter, the article seized kept in Malkhana, but article seized was neither sealed nor the sealed of the Officer-inCharge of the police station was put on it. It has further been contended that there is no mentioned in the entire evidence, when the sample was taken, though, order sheet shows Magistrate was appointed for sampling on 12. 10. 2009 and hence it is apparent that articles were kept more than two months without having been sealed, though, it has come in evidence that Magistrate was appointed for sampling, but the evidence of the Magistrate has not been recorded nor has been adduced evidence neither certification of the Magistrate was proved. The article was not weight or sampling. There is neither any evidence regarding certifying correctness of inventory so prepared nor there is certification by the learned Magistrate nor sampling of drugs nor weight of each packet has been taken and hence there is totally non-compliance of Section 52A, 55 and 57 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Neither certification of the Magistrate was proved nor article seized ever placed before the Court. Hence it is contended that the
