Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed in default as the appellant failed to appear. The respondent's counsel appeared, but no arguments were heard for the appellant.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court LPA No.889 of 2014 (2) dt.05-09-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.889 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10550 of 2014 ====================================================== Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Uday Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ga8-Sandeep Kumar ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 2 | 05-09-2014 None has appeared for the appellant. |
| However, Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 is present. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the appeal stands dismissed for default. |
|
| (I. A. Ansari, J) | |
| A.I./- U |
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) |
Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav
The State of Bihar
I. A. Ansari
Amareesh Kumar Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
