The Letters Patent Appeal filed by a teacher was disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court of Patna, with liberty to the appellant to approach the court or seek legal remedies in the future if advised.
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court in future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.572 of 2014 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17611 of 2011
====================================================== Pankaj Kumar, son of Dinesh Kumar Singh, resident of village- Lembua, Bahera, P.O.-Nowgarh, Via-Madanpur, P.S.-Amas, District- Gaya. .... .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education Department, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Gaya, District- Gaya. 4. The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Gaya, District- Gaya. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya. 6. The Block Development Officer, Amas, District- Gaya. 7. The Block Area Education Extension Officer, Amas, District- Gaya. 8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Karandih, P.S.-Amas, District- Gaya. 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Karamdih, P.S.-Amas, DistrictGaya.
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Onkar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar, A.C. to G.P.6
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI)
2 08-09-2014 Heard Mr. Onkar Kumar, learned counsel for the
appellant, who submits that the appellant would file a review application and hence this appeal may be disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible in law.
Patna High Court LPA No.572 of 2014 (2) dt.08-09-2014
2/2
Heard also Mr. Gyan Shankar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.6 appearing for the State, who submits that a contempt has been initiated at the instance of the appellant.
appellant.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible in law.
(I. A. Ansari, .J)
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)
V.K. Pandey/-
U
Pankaj Kumar, son of Dinesh Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
The Director, Primary Education Department, Patna
The District Magistrate, Gaya
The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Gaya
The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya
I. A. Ansari
Amaresh Kumar Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
