Appeal withdrawn. Court allowed withdrawal without prejudice to appellants' right to seek review of the impugned order.
Letters Patent Appeal disposed as withdrawn without prejudice to right to file review.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court LPA No.248 of 2014 (3) dt.07-04-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.248 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21457 of 2012 ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar & Ors .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. B.K.Sinha, Sr. Advocate With Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate |
|
|---|---|
| For the State- Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GA 6 For Respondent Nos. 5 and 6: Mr. Kishore Kr. Sinha ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 3 | 07-04-2014 Heard Mr. B.K.Sinha, learned Senior counsel for the |
| appellants, Mr. S.Raza Ahamad, learned AAG IX, appearing for | |
| the State-respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Kishore Kr. Sinha, | |
| learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. | |
| During the course of submissions made on behalf of the appellants for the purpose of admission of this appeal, it has been |
|
| submitted, on behalf of the appellants, that aggrieved by the order, which stands impugned in this appeal, the appellants have already |
|
| filed a writ petition, on 3rdof March, 2014, under Article 226 of | |
| the Constitution of India, which has given rise to C.W.J.C. No. | |
| 4967 of 2014 and, hence, the appellants would, now, make an | |
| application for review of the order, dated 18.12.2013, passed in |
Patna High Court LPA No.248 of 2014 (3) dt.07-04-2014
C.W.J.C.No.21457 of 2012, which the appellants have put to challenge in this appeal.
Because of the fact that the appellants would be filing review petition, this appeal, according to the learned Senior counsel for the appellants, may be allowed to be withdrawn without any prejudice to the rights of the appellants to apply for review of the order, dated 18.12.2013, which stands impugned in this appeal. To the submissions so made, no objection has been made on behalf of the respondents.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn making it clear that withdrawal of this appeal shall be without prejudice to the rights, if any, of the appellants to file appropriate petition seeking review of the order, which stands impugned in this appeal.
(I. A. Ansari, J)
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
A.I./-
Ranjan Kumar & Ors
The State of Bihar & Ors
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
