Two-judge bench held that Letters Patent Appeal became infructuous and dismissed it without appellant's presence.
Infructuous appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1652 of 2012
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2191 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Respondents-Appellants
Versus
Ashok Kumar Maurya S/O Late Nathuni Prasad, Suspended District Sub Registrar, R/O Village- Akauna, Post- Sherghati, District- Gaya (Presently posted at I.R.O. Office, Purnia Division, Purnia)
.... .... Petitioner-Respondent
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : None
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
This Appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent arising from the order dated 27th March 2012 made by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 2191 of 2012 has, in our view, become infructuous.
Patna High Court LPA No.1652 of 2012 (3) dt.01-05-2014
2/2
The Appeal is accordingly dismissed as having
become infructuous.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
mrl
State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Registration, Excise And Prohibition (Registration), Government of Bihar
Ashok Kumar Maurya
R.M. Doshit
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
