Sitab Lal v. Sheo Prasad and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Patna dismissed two second appeals by default on 02-05-2013 as appellants failed to appear on repeated calls despite summons.
What the court decided
Patna High Court SA No.398 of 1990 (11) dt.02-05-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.398 of 1990 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Sitab Lal .... .... Appellant/s Versus Sheo Prasad & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| with Second Appeal No.401 of 1990 ====================================================== |
|
| Sitab Lal .... .... Appellant/s Versus |
|
| Sheo Prasad Tamera & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
Appearance : (In SA No.398 of 1990) For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (In SA No.401 of 1990) For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 11 | 02-05-2013 On repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the appellant. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed for default. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) |
BKS/-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sitab Lal
- respondent
Sheo Prasad & Ors
- respondent
Sheo Prasad Tamera & Ors
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court