Rabindra Singh v. Lakhichand Mistri
Case brief
What is this about?
SA No.386 of 1990 (7) dt.02-05-2013 IN THE…
What did the court decide?
None; appeal dismissed for default due to absence of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court SA No.386 of 1990 (7) dt.02-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Second Appeal No.386 of 1990
======================================================
Rabindra Singh
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Lakhichand Mistri
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI
SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
7 02-05-2013 On repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the
appellant.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for default.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
BKS/-
Rabindra Singh
Lakhichand Mistri
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court