This is an oral order by the Patna High Court disposing of a review petition filed against an earlier order refusing a second amendment to a writ petition. The court granted liberty to prefer an appeal.
Liberty to prefer appeal against the original writ order and the review order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.394 of 2012 (2) dt.06-02-2013
1
| IN THE HIGH CO Civ Civil Writ =================== Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Manju Sinha & Ors. =================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : =================== |
URT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA il Review No.394 of 2012 In Jurisdiction Case No. 160 of 2011 =================================== Kumar Singh & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s =================================== Mr. Nagendra Rai Mr. =================================== |
|
|---|---|---|
| CORAM: HONOURA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER |
BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA |
|
| 2 | 06-02-2013 The petitioner |
filed C.W.J.C. No. 160 of 2011 against |
| order refusing two amendment while rej |
amendments. This Court allowed one ecting other. |
|
| Learned counse | l for the petitioner submits that on earlier | |
| occasion certain fact such by the instant brought on record. It appears from did not allow the sec |
s could not be brought on record and as review application those facts are being the order dated 29.8.2011 that this Court ond amendment as no averment was made |
|
| in the amendment | petition that despite due diligence the | |
| amendment sought statement. |
was not incorporated in the written |
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this review application is disposed of with liberty to the
Patna High Court C. REV. No.394 of 2012 (2) dt.06-02-2013
2
petitioner to prefer an appeal both against the order passed in the writ application as well as in the review application, if so advised.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
KHAN/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the review application on facts not earlier brought on record.
Pramod Kumar @ Pramod & Others
Kumar Singh & Others
Pratap Singh
Samarendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
