Oral order dismissing a contempt petition as having been disposed of following the filing of an order before the Licensing Authority, allowing the petitioner to challenge it via Appellate Authority.
Contempt petition is disposed of; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge the Licensing Authority order before Appellate Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.6641 of 2012 (2) dt.24-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.6641 of 2012
====================================================== Uday Kumar Singh son of Sita Ram Singh, Resident of Village – Matiyara, P.O.- Kayam Nagar, P.S. Koilwar, District Bhojpur
.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Jai Shankar Pd. Yadav, The Joint Secretary, Department Of Food And Consumer Protection, Patna 2. Dr. Pratima Bharti, The District Magistrate, Bhojpur At Ara 3. Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ara 4. Mr. Vijay Das, The District Supply Officer, Bhojpur At Ara 5. Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, The Block Supply Officer, Koelwar, ( Bhojpur ) .... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 24-06-2013 In compliance of the order of the High Court dated 20.7.2012, Annexure-1 Licensing Authority has already passed order dated 17.12.2012, Annexure-A to the show cause.
In case, petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 17.12.2012, Annexure-A, he is at liberty to challenge the said order before the Appellate Authority in accordance with law and with the said observation, the contempt petition is disposed of.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
Arjun/-
Uday Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
