Dismissed

Manoj Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2013MJC/5739/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a miscellaneous application seeking compliance regarding the petitioner's suspension and departmental proceedings. The court rejected the argument based on the respondents' submission that suspension was revoked, as the petitioner's counsel was absent to contest the stand.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's application for compliance regarding suspension and departmental proceedings is dismissed.

Manoj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5739 of 2011

¶2

====================================================== 1. Manoj Kumar S/O Motichand Lal R/O Kadamkuan, South Of Congress Maidan, P.S.-Kadamkuan, Distt.-Patna, Bihar Posted As Circle Officer (Under Suspension) Taraiya Circle (Saran) With Present Headquarters In The Office Of The Commissioner, Tirhut Sub-Division, Muzaffarpur

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. Mr. Deepak Kumar, Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. Mr. Sidhnath Ram, Under Secretary, Personnel And Adminstrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar Patna 4. Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhan, Vigilance Commissioner (Now The Principal Secretary), Department Of Vigilance, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 5. Dr. M.A. Ibrahimi, Departmental Enquiry Commissiner, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶4

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Kr. Pandey, A.C. to S.C.5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 01-07-2013 Referring to Resolution of the Department, annexed as Annexure-B with the supplementary show cause, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the orders of this Court has been complied with since the departmental proceeding against the petitioner could not be concluded within the time granted by this Court, petitioner’s suspension has been revoked and he has been allowed to join. Hence, he submits that the orders of this Court have been fully complied with by the opposite parties.

¶6

Patna High Court MJC No.5739 of 2011 (3) dt.01-07-2013

¶7

2/2

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present to

¶9

controvert the stand of learned counsel for the opposite parties.

¶10

This application is accordingly dismissed.

¶11

(Jayanandan Singh, J)

¶12

Pradeep/-

Manoj Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Gayatri Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Barnwal Propties Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijay Kumar Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Budhpriya Ganesh Vs The Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors.

Sangita Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.