The Patna High Court allowed the restoration of C.R. No. 236 of 2011, which had been previously dismissed for non-prosecution, citing the negligence of a private clerk for failing to inform counsel.
Restoration of C.R. No. 236 of 2011 to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.4103 of 2013 (2) dt.20-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4103 of 2013
In
C.R. 236 of 2011
====================================================== Somaru Yadav @ Samaru Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Janeshwar Singh @ Janeshwar Yadav & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-08-2013 This application has been filed for restoration of C.R.No. 236 of 2011 which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 2.8.2013. Absence of learned counsel on the day of dismissal of this application is shown due to negligence of private clerk to not inform the counsel, appears sufficient ground. Accordingly, the application is allowed and C.R. No. 236 of 2011 is restored to its original file.
(Mandhata Singh, J)
A.I./-
Somaru Yadav @ Samaru Singh
Janeshwar Singh @ Janeshwar Yadav & Ors.
Mandhata Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
