The High Court dismissed a modification application for non-prosecution as none of the petitioners appeared to pursue the matter on the scheduled dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1709 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15669 of 2008 ====================================================== Babu Chand Das and Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar and Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 3 24-10-2013 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not more interested in pursuing the matter and none had also appeared on 22.10.2013 as well as on 23.10.2013 when the matter was called out. The modification application is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Vikash Jain, J) Ashwini/-
Babu Chand Das and Ors.
The State of Bihar and Ors.
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
