In a miscellaneous jurisdiction contempt application, the single-judge bench disposed of the matter because the respondents admitted compliance with earlier directions. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1251 of 2012
====================================================== Sachindra Kumar Singh S/O Late Vishwanth Prasad Singh R/O VillLachminiya, P.O.Gamhariya, P.S.Gamhariya, Distt-Madhepura
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Human Resouces Development Department Government Of Bihar , Patna 2. Dr.Bimal Kumar, Vice Chancellor , B.R.Ambedkar Bihar University Muzaffarpur 3. Dr. A.P.Mishra, The Registrar, Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. N. Hoda Khan Sc18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER ***************
05. 19.06.2013 Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the stand taken by the respondents that now they are finally complied with the direction issued earlier. Contempt application stands disposed off in view of the above.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
SKM/-
Sachindra Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Dr. Bimal Kumar
Dr. A.P. Mishra
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
