The Court in an oral order dismissed the writ application, declining to issue specific directions. The petitioner was advised to approach the concerned authority for redress first.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19869 of 2010
====================================================== 1. Ram Dular Singh S/O Late Radha Singh R/O Vill.- Gadura, P.S.Sheosagar Block Cum Anchal Sheosagar, Distt.- Rohtas At Sasaram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Rohtas At Sasaram 3. The Circle Officer, Anchal Sheosagar, Distt.- Rohtas At Sasaram 4. The Officer-In-Charge, P.S.- Sheosagar, Distt.- Rohtas At Sasaram .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunanda Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ramesh Kr. Singh(Gp13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 3 18-06-2013 Looking at the nature of dispute raised in the present writ application, this Court is not inclined to pass any direction in favour of the petitioner. At this stage, let the petitioner move the concerned authority on this issue, who shall look into the grievance and issue directions to the concerned authority. Writ application is disposed of.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
sk
Ram Dular Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Collector, Rohtas
The Circle Officer, Anchal Sheosagar
The Officer-In-Charge, P.S.- Sheosagar
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
