In a default order, the Patna High Court dismissed the first appeal because the appellants failed to appear in court despite repeated calls.
First appeal dismissed for default due to non-appearance of appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court FA No.253 of 1982 (10) dt.11-01-2013
| IN THE HIGH CO Fi =================== |
URT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA rst Appeal No.253 of 1982 =================================== |
|
|---|---|---|
| Md.Israil Khurshed Alam & Ors =================== |
.... .... Appellant/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s =================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : For the Respondent/s : =================== CORAM: HONOURAB SAHOO ORAL ORDER |
Mr. S.R.Ghosal Mr. Ishwari Singh =================================== LE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR |
|
| 10 | 11-01-2013 Inspite |
of repeated calls nobody appears. |
| Accordingly, this first | appeal is dismissed for default. | |
| S.S./- | (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) |
Md. Israil
Khurshed Alam
Ors
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
