Dismissed
Judagi Bhagat v. State of Bihar
Patna HCFA/521/1981
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The first appeal was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant despite repeated calls. The order is an oral dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Patna High Court FA No.521 of 1981 (21) dt.10-01-2013
¶2
| IN THE HIGH COURT First App ======================== |
OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA eal No.521 of 1981 ============================== |
|
|---|---|---|
| Judagi Bhagat State Of Bihar ======================== |
.... .... Appellant/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s ============================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. |
G.Prasad Ram Ekbal Sinha Upendra Pd. Nand Kishore Pd. Sinha Arun Kr. Pd. |
|
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mr. ======================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR SAHOO ORAL ORDER |
T.N.Maitin (Gp1) Jagarnath Singh ============================== . JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR |
|
| 21 | 10-01-2013 Inspite of Accordingly, this first appea |
repeated calls nobody appears. l is dismissed for default. |
| S.S./- | (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether to dismiss the first appeal for default due to non-appearance of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Judagi Bhagat
- respondent
State Of Bihar
Coram
AI extract
Mungeshwar Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court