The petitioner sought release of seized food grains alleged to have deteriorated. The court held the application had become infructuous due to the passage of time and disposed of the matter.
The writ application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7996 of 2006 ====================================================== Umesh Kumar, son of Sri Doman Sah, Resident of Naya Bazar, P.S. and District Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. S.D.O., Lakhisarai .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. K.C.K.Sinha Mr. D.N.Tiwari, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, AC to GP12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 8 25-11-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage of time, food grains seized have deteriorated and become unfit for human consumption. Hence, the writ application filed for release of the same has now become infructuous. This application is disposed of as such.
(Jayanandan Singh, J)
B.T/-
Umesh Kumar
The State Of Bihar
S.D.O., Lakhisarai
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
