Patna High Court orally dismissed a writ application under administrative quiescence as not pressed due to non-appearance of the petitioner despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6010 of 2003 (4) dt.15-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6010 of 2003
====================================================== Sumitra Devi @ Sumitra Devi Gupta .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp3) Mr. K.B.Nath Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshari Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sinha
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 15-03-2013 When the case was called out on 08.03.2013, no one had appeared for the petitioner. Today also no one appears. The writ application is dismissed as not pressed.
Arvind/- (Jayanandan Singh, J)
Sumitra Devi @ Sumitra Devi Gupta
The State Of Bihar
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
