The Patna High Court dismissed a writ application as not pressed, as the petitioner's counsel could not obtain instructions from the client despite best efforts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3228 of 1993 (7) dt.15-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3228 of 1993
.... .... Respondent/s
For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.A.Narain (Aag2) Mr. J.P.Karn (S.C.7)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
7 15-03-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ application appears to have become infructuous as he is not getting instructions from his client in spite of best efforts. The writ application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Arvind/- (Jayanandan Singh, J)
Kishanpur Deed Writers Association through its Secretary
The State of Bihar through the Inspector General of Registration
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
