Petitioners filed a writ petition. A compromise petition was filed by the parties. The court found the parties agreed to abide by the compromise terms and held no adjudication was required. The writ was dismissed in terms of the compromise.
The writ petition was dismissed in terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5801 of 2010
Patna High Court CWJC No.5801 of 2010 (8) dt.20-06-2013
2 / 2
As counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.3 is agreeable to the fact that parties will abide by the terms and conditions of the compromise petition, no adjudication is required to be made in the writ application. They will honour the terms of the compromise and act accordingly.
Writ is dismissed in terms of the compromise.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
R.K.Pathak/-
Madhusudan Prasad Mandal
Surya Narayan Mandal
Baidya Nath Mandal
Binay Kumar Mandal
The State of Bihar
Ram Narayan Mandal
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
