Dismissed
Kishun Sharma v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/20179/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20179 of 2010
====================================================== 1. Kishun Sharma S/O Late Dudheshwar Sharma R/O Vill.- Parashurampur, P.S.- Parasi (Arwal), Distt.- Arwal .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Arwal 3. The Additional Collector, Arwal 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Arwal 5. The Circle Officer, Kaler, Distt.- Arwal 6. Sonamati Devi W/O Late Ramjanam Sao 7. Chandrma Sao S/O Late Ramjanam Sao 8. Birendra Sao S/O Late Ramjanam Sao 9. Binod Sao S/O Late Ram Janam Sao 10. Binkatesh Sao S/O Late Ramjanam Sao .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar (AAG 10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 6 24-07-2013 Writ has been filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent State authorities to remove the encroachment and construction made by the respondents second set over Khata No.68, Plot No. 950 at Village Parshurampur, P S – Parasi, District – Arwal. On the direction of the Court detailed counter affidavits on behalf of the SDO as well as the Circle Officer indicating the ground reality have been filed. The present litigation seems to be a selective one on the directive of the handful person though some
Patna High Court CWJC No.20179 of 2010 (6) dt.24-07-2013
2 / 2
encroachment not limited to the private respondents has been talked about in the report.
Since the bona fide of the petitioner is missing in the matter, the Court would not pass any decisive order in his favour at this juncture but he is free to pursue the matter with the local authorities in accordance with law.
Writ is otherwise dismissed with liberty as above.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
R.K.Pathak/-
Kishun Sharma
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate cum Collector, Arwal
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court