The Patna High Court held that the writ application had become infructuous as nothing further was required to be done in the matter, resulting in its dismissal.
Writ application dismissed as infructuous with no further action required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4603 of 2002 (6) dt.23-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4603 of 2002 ====================================================== Sheo Shankar Rai, son of Ram Prakash Rai, resident of village - Jagdishpur, P S – Ghataho, District – Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Sheo Prasad Shah & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mr. Ritesh Kumar Mr. Shree Ram Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp6) Mr. S.P.Shrivastava Mr. Rabindra Kumar Tiwaryt Mr. Jugal Kishore Prasad Mr. K.B.Nath Mr. (Sc16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 6 23-07-2013 Writ application has become infructuous. In view of the same nothing is required to be done further in this matter. It is dismissed accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
R.K.Pathak/-
Sheo Shankar Rai
Sheo Prasad Shah & Ors
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
