Writ application filed by petitioner seeking revision was allowed to be withdrawn; accordingly, the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16769 of 2011
====================================================== Ram Dular Yadav S/O Late Mul Chand Yadav Resident Of VillageTengrar, Police Station-Khutauna, District-Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Food, Supply and Commerce, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Collector, Madhubani. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Phulparas, District-Madhubani. 5. The Block Supply Officer, Khutauna, Police Station-Khutauna, DistrictMadhubani. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh, A.C. to S.C. 21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 4 24-04-2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ application to move in revision which may be available to him under the law. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
Sanjay-II/-
Ram Dular Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
