The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ petition where the parties entered into a compromise agreement regarding boundary dispute during the pendency of the application.
Writ application disposed of following compromise between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13471 of 2012 (4) dt.24-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13471 of 2012
======================================================
Shambhu Nath @ Shambhoo Nath S/O Late Gaya Prasad Resident of Mohalla- G.B. Road, P.S- Kotwali, District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, District Gaya. 3. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar, District- Gaya. 4. The Executive Magistrate, Sadar, District- Gaya. 5. Vishwanath Kumar S/O Late Gaya Prasad Resident of Mohalla- G.B. Road, P.S- Kotwali, District- Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Atal Bihari Pandey, AC to AAG 12 For Respondent No.5 : Mr.Raghwanand, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 4 24-09-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the State and for private respondent No.5. Learned counsels for the petitioner and for respondent No.5 submit that during the pendency of the writ application the petitioner, respondent No.5 and their mother Saraswati Devi have entered into a compromise, pursuant to which a deed of compromise along with a trace map has been signed by the parties on 26.1.2013 in presence of common panches, which documents have been annexed in the supplementary affidavit and the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.5.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ application is disposed of.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
spal/-
Shambhu Nath @ Shambhoo Nath
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, District Gaya
The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar, District- Gaya
The Executive Magistrate, Sadar, District- Gaya
Vishwanath Kumar
Ramesh Kumar Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
