Petitioners sought compensation for compassionate appointment. The court dismissed the writ petition as a stale claim due to the significant delay in pursuing the application, despite an older panel having been prepared.
Petition dismissed for being a stale claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13119 of 2013 (2) dt.12-07-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13119 of 2013
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Siddharth Shankar Pandey, Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP 24. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
appointment of the petitioners who have been working as Awazi Choukidars/Dafadars.
application for appointment on compassionate ground was duly filed
Patna High Court CWJC No.13119 of 2013 (2) dt.12-07-2013
2
within time in the year 1993 and in respect of which a panel of Awazi Choukidars/Dafadars was also prepared for appointment on 21.1.2000.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court is inclined to entertain a complaint filed after a long delay regarding compassionate appointment.
Whether a writ petition regarding compassionate appointment stands dismissed for being a stale claim.
Sanjeev Kumar Singh and others
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
