Awadhesh Roy v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12763 of 2007
====================================================== Awadhesh Roy son of Ram Lakhan Roy, resident of village Prabodhi Narendra, P.S. Sarai, Dist. Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Vaishali. 2. Subdivisional Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali. 3. Block Development Officer, Lalganj, Hajipur, Vaishali. 4. Prabhari Chikitsa Officer Primary Health Centre, Lalganj, Vaishali. 5. Executive Engineer, N.R.E.P., Vaishali. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Md. Faiz Ahmad, A.C. to G.P.7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 4 04-01-2013 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. None had appeared yesterday also on 3.1.2013 when the case was called out. It appears from the record that earlier also the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution on 9.2.2012. However, the same was restored vide order dated 8.8.2012 passed in M.J.C. No.1439 of 2012. Again none has represented the petitioner on two consecutive dates.
As a result, this application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
N.H./-
Awadhesh Roy
The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Vaishali
Subdivisional Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali
Block Development Officer, Lalganj, Hajipur
Prabhari Chikitsa Officer Primary Health Centre, Lalganj
Executive Engineer, N.R.E.P., Vaishali
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court