Petitioners withdrew an application to move before the appropriate forum; liberty to file appropriate appeal granted; application dismissed.
Liberty granted to file appropriate appeal. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10352 of 2007 (5) dt.04-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10352 of 2007
====================================================== 1. Md.Habib Ansari @ Habib Mian. 2. Md. Rafique Ansari @ Rafique Mian. 3. Md. Sadik Ansari. All sons of late Hurmat Miyan, resident of village Tenduni, P.O. + P.S. Bikramganj, District Rohtas. .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Collector, Rohtas 2. Khairu Nisa wife of Qurban Ansari, resident of village Tenduni, Ward No.1, P.O. + P.S. Bikramganj, District Rohtas. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Dhrub Narayan, Sr. Advocate Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Jha, Advocate Mr. Dinbandhu Singh, G.P.9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 5 04-01-2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this application to move before the appropriate forum by filing appropriate appeal. Liberty is granted. This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
N.H./-
Md.Habib Ansari @ Habib Mian, Md. Rafique Ansari @ Rafique Mian, Md. Sadik Ansari
The State of Bihar, through the Collector, Rohtas
Khairu Nisa wife of Qurban Ansari
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
