The High Court dismissed the writ petition as none of the petitioners appeared on notice or on the day of hearing to press the petition or seek an adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1083 of 2005 ============================================ |
PATNA ========== |
|
|---|---|---|
Kailash Tiwary & Ors .... ... Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... ============================================ |
. Petitioner/s Respondent/s ========== |
|
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Aag2) |
||
| ============================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KU ORAL ORDER |
========== MAR |
|
| 7 |
28-01-2013 Today again, on call, none appeared on |
behalf of the |
| petitioners either to press the petition or to make | a prayer for | |
| adjournment. On earlier occasion also, none had app | eared. | |
| The writ petition stands dismissed prosecution. |
due to non | |
| Praful/ | - (Rakesh Kumar, J) |
Kailash Tiwary & Ors
The State Of Bihar & Ors
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
