An oral order allowing the petitioner to avail statutory remedy against an impugned decision for limitation purposes; the writ petition was disposed of.
The petitioner may be allowed to avail statutory remedy; period while pursuing the petition excluded for limitation calculation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 173 of 2013
==================================================
Smt. Pushpa Singh wife of Binay Kumar Singh Resident of Sabalpur, P.S. Deedarganj, Patnacity (presently residing at Panchwati Nepali Kothi, Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, Town and District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5. 24-01-2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General-IX, submits that the petitioner may be allowed to avail statutory remedy.
The prayer is allowed.
The petition stands disposed of.
It is made clear that period, consumed while
Patna High Court CWJC No.173 of 2013 (5) dt.24-01-2013
2 / 2
pursuing the present writ petition, shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter by the authority concerned.
Anay
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Smt. Pushpa Singh
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
