This was an oral order in a criminal revision petition where the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had been settled between parties, leading the court to dismiss the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.257 of 2010 (6) dt.28-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.257 of 2010 ====================================================== Ahamad Mian .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Respondent/s For the Petitioner :- Brij Kishore Mishra, Advocate. For the State :- Mrs. Renuka Ratnakar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 6 28-01-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties, so the petitioner does not wants to press this application. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/-
Ahamad Mian
The State Of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
