This criminal revision was dismissed by a full bench order. The High Court found no illegality in the impugned Family Court judgment directing the respondent to pay maintenance to the petitioners and interfered with the revisional jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1885 of 2009
===================================================== 1. Rita Devi, wife of Amit Kumar Kesri. 2. Ankit Kumar, son of Amit Kumar Kesri. Resident of Mohalla-Marwari Bazar, P.S. Samastipur(Town), District-Samastipur, Presently residing C/o Sri Devki Das, resident of Mohalla-Bahadurpur, Ward No.4, P.S. Samastipur (Town), District-Samastipur. .... .... Petitioners. Versus 1. Amit Kumar Kesri, son of Gopal Prasad Kesri @ Khajju Chaudhary, resident of Mohalla-Marwari Bazar, beside Kamdhenu Show Room, P.S. Samastipur (Town), DistrictSamastipur. 2. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite parties. ===================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners. : Mr. Kumar Praveen, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P.
===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER
-------------
13 22-01-2013 Heard.
The petitioners have preferred this Criminal Revision against the Judgment dated 1.9.2009 passed in Maintenance Case No.8 of 2003/189 of 2005 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur, whereby the Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur, directed the opposite party no.1, Amit Kumar Kesri, to pay Rs.2000/- to the petitioners {Rs.1000/- per month for the maintenance of petitioner no.1, Rita Devi and Rs.1000/- per month for the maintenance of petitioner no.2, Ankit Kumar, son of the petitioner no.1} with effect from 1.1.2009.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1885 of 2009 (13) dt.22-01-2013
2 / 2
From perusal of the impugned Judgment, I find no illegality for interference with the same in revisional jurisdiction. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision stands dismissed.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
P.S./-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any illegality exists in the Family Court judgment directing the opposite party to pay maintenance to the petitioners warranting interference in criminal revision.
Rita Devi
Ankit Kumar
Amit Kumar Kesri
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
