Manoj Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail rejected against petitioner holding fake notes and with criminal antecedents.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail in connection with DRI Case No. 09 of 2013 stands rejected.
What the court decided
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28841 of 2013 (4) dt.04-09-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28841 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|---|
1. Manoj Sah S/O Shri Sundar Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B. N. Mishra For Union of India : Mr. Devendra Kumar DR9 ====================================================== |
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER |
| 4 04-09-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. |
| Taking into consideration that two lacs ninety one thousand |
| fake notes were recovered from possession of the petitioner and as per submission of learned counsel for Union of India, the petitioner carries criminal antecedent of same nature, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with DRI Case No. 09 of 2013 corresponding to Trial No. 301 of 2013 pending in the court of Presiding Officer (Spl.) Economic Offences, Muzaffarpur stands rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. |
| SHAHZAD/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in connection with DRI Case No.09 of 2013.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Sah
- respondent
The State Of Bihar
Coram
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court