Disposed

Uma Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Oct 2013CR. MISC./15635/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to two petitioners facing prosecution for sections 341, 323, 384, 504/34 IPC and offences under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. Bail was conditioned on furnishing bonds and adhering to specific terms to ensure parity with a co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail with conditions regarding sureties, attendance, and staggered bonds.

Uma Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15635 of 2013

¶3

====================================================== 1. Uma Yadav 2. Sarju Yadav

¶4

Both sons of Charitar Yadav, R/O Village-Yagan Khurd, P.S.-Rajauli, Distt.-Nawada .

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.P. Singh, Advocate.

¶6

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 07-10-2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶8

Having regard to the fact that the petitioners are facing prosecution for offences under Sections 341, 323, 384, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(i-iv) (i-x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as also keeping in view that co-accused Charitar Yadav having identical allegation and having criminal antecedent alike the petitioners has been directed to be released on bail vide order dated 2^nd September 2013 in Cri. Misc. No. 30710 of 2013, this Court, also for maintaining parity, would direct for release of the above named petitioners namely Uma Yadav and Sarju Yadav on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 06 of 2013, subject to the following three conditions:

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15635 of 2013 (3) dt.07-10-2013

¶10

2 / 2

¶11

(i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by a Government servant and the other by a close family relative of the petitioners.

¶12

(ii) The petitioners will remain present in course of trial on each and every date and their absence on two consecutive dates would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of their bail.

¶13

(iii) The petitioners, in case, are now made accused in any other criminal case that by itself would lead to cancellation of their bail.

¶14

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J)

Uma Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudama Rajbanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Tempu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Choudhary @ Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar