Allowed

Kamal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2013CR. MISC./11394/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Released a petitioner accused of offences under Sections 363, 366(A), 504, and 506/34 IPC on bail of Rs. 5,000 due to lack of sexual assault allegations, subject to specific undertakings regarding interference, address changes, attendance, and representation.

What did the court decide?

Released the petitioner on bail of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties subject to undertaking to provide genealogy, inform of address change, absence in other cases, informing about imminent similar cases, re

Kamal Sah Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11394 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== Kamal Sah, Son of Shri Shambhu Sah.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar

¶6

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶8

02. 25.04.2013

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶10

State.

¶11

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 363, 366(A), 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Considering that there is no allegation of sexual assault upon the victim, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 27 of 2013 (G.R. No. 89 of 2013) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11394 of 2013 (2) dt.25-04-2013

¶14

¶15

other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶16

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶17

Vikash/-

Kamal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Dharmendra Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Upendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Irshad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghubir Kumar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Mohammad Ladle @ Parwej Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar