Dismissed

Anil Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Aug 2012MJC/4330/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-paragraph oral order dismissing the petitioner's claim for salary payments from the date of termination, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies through appropriate channels as prior writ orders and contempt findings precluded the grievance.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to pursue appropriate remedies; the proceeding was disposed without granting payment.

Anil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4330 of 2011

¶3

====================================================== 1. Anil Kumar S/O Bhikhari Singh Resident Of Village - Amlori, P.S. - Siwan Muffassil, Distt. - Siwan.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, Through Sri. Anup Mukherjee S/o not known Its Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2. Anjani Kumar Singh S/o not known The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Department Of Human Resources, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 3. Kamal Kishore Sinha, S/o not knownThe Additional Commissioner, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 4. Kamal Kishore Sinha , s/o not known The Director, Secondary Education, Department Of Human Resources, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 5. Yugesh Chandra Singh S/o not known The Reasonal Deputy Director Of Education, Saran Division, Chhapra. 6. Lalit Narayan Rajak S/o not knownThe District Suprintendent Of Education-cum- District Programme Officer Siwan. 7. Mira Banarjee W/o not known The Deputy Inspectoress Of School, Siwan. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal Ga1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

6 08-08-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties.

¶6

Considering the submission from the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 6 that in C.W.J.C. Nos. 2546 of 2006/14774 of 2004, the writ Court itself had directed payment from the date of termination, and that there was no such order in the present case read with the order dated 21.3.2012 in the contempt proceedings, it is not possible to consider the grievance further for payment of

¶7

Patna High Court MJC No.4330 of 2011 (6) dt.08-08-2012

¶8

2 / 2

¶9

salary from the date of termination.

¶10

If so advised, the petitioner may pursue remedies appropriately.

¶11

The proceeding stands disposed.

¶12

P. Kumar/- (Navin Sinha, J)

Anil Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Krishna Singh and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ramanand Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramgati Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kalamuddin Mian Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Bimal Chand Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Nakul Mandal @ Popli Mandal Vs the State of Bihar