Disposes of a contempt petition arising from orders denying the petitioner appointment as a bank employee due to a post being filled. Grants liberty to challenge subsequent orders.
Disposal of contempt petition with liberty to challenge orders dated 3/7.1.2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.271 of 2011 (6) dt.11-09-2012
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.271 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Ashok Kumar Goswami, son of late Raghu Nath Goswami, resident of |
|
| mohalla Golghar Park Road Patna-1 G.P.O. Gandhi Maidan Patna-1 | |
| , , , , .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Bank Of Maharastra through Mr. Anup Shankar Bhattacharya, the Chairman/Managing Director, Bank of Maharastra, Lok Mangal, 1501, Shiwaji Nagar, Pune-411005 2. Mr. P.C. Verma, the Chief Manager(Personnel and Industrial Relation) Bank of Maharastra, Lok Mangal, 1501, Shiwaji Nagar, Pune-411005 3. Mr. Arun Kumar Mishra, Regional Manager, Bank of Maharastra, Regional Officer-3, Netaji Subhash Road, Kilkata-700001 4. Mr. Keshaw N. Panda, the Chief Manager, Bank of Maharastra, Pandey Plaza, Ist Floor, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001 5. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER |
|
| 6 | 11-09-2012 In compliance of the order of the High Court dated |
| 6.9.2010 the Bank of Maharastra has passed order dated 3.1.2011 which has been communicated to the petitioner on 7.1.2011 stating therein that his appointment on the basis of advertisement dated 15.09.2004, Annexure-1 to the writ petition cannot be made as the post advertised thereunder has since been filled in. It is submitted that the statement made in the two orders is incorrect as Sri Umesh |
|
| Thakur from the same panel has been appointed without considering the case of the petitioner for such appointment. The contempt petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders dated 3/7.1.2011. |
(V.N. Sinha, J) Rajesh/-
Ashok Kumar Goswami
Bank of Maharastra
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
