The Patna High Court observed that the petitioner should challenge the removal order by filing an appeal before the Collector, the designated Appellate Authority, before seeking review of the order.
The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority (Collector). The writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16580 of 2012
====================================================== Laxmi Prasad Sah Son Of Late Prithvichandra Sah Resident Of VillageBela, P.O. Barahser, P.S. Bihra, District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, AC to GA-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.16580 of 2012 (2) dt.10-09-2012
2 / 2
24.7.2012, Annexure-2 by filing appeal before the Appellate Authority i.e. the Collector of the district and with this observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
Arjun/-
Laxmi Prasad Sah
State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary
The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa
The District Magistrate, Saharsa
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Saharsa
Kali Charan Sah
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
