This oral order dealt with a miscellaneous jurisdiction case seeking further extension of time for compliance. The court allowed the petition despite the previous extension having lapsed.
Extension of time for compliance is granted for a period of three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2571 of 2012 (2) dt.05-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2571 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 05-09-2012 This application has been filed on 4.5.2012 seeking extension of the period of two months granted by order dated 3.1.2012 for compliance of the order.
Not only has the request for extension of time been made after the expiry of the peremptory time, but by now even the request for extension made has lapsed.
However, considering the statements made in paragraph Nos.5 to 7 of the present application, it is allowed and the time granted is extended by three months from today.
M.J.C. application is allowed.
(Navin Sinha, J)
K.C.jha/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition by way of miscellaneous jurisdiction case filed for extension of time is permissible after peremptory time has lapsed.
State Of Bihar Through Vigilance
Laxmi Narayan Singh
Ram Naresh Singh
Lakhendra Prasad
Indra Deo Prasad Ii
Navin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
