Petitioner challenged compliance of a contempt order. Court allowed one month for representation regarding remaining compliance before final disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2115 of 2012
====================================================== 1. Krishna Kant Sinha S/O Late Jagat Nand Lal R/O Rental Flat - 293, Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Kankarbagh In The Town And District Of Patna
.... .... Petitioner/s
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gautam Bose Aag8
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 07-12-2012 Order under contempt has been complied. If the petitioner feels that it is not fully complied, he may make representation before the concerned authority for remaining compliance explaining as to how the full order has not been complied. Representation shall be decided within a period of one month.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed.
(Prakash Chandra Verma, J)
Mkr./-
Krishna Kant Sinha
State Of Bihar
Prakash Chandra Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
