Dismissed

Mohammad Anwar Jawed v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC7 Dec 2012CWJC/9719/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of two writ petitions seeking pension benefits by noting an adverse Full Bench judgment and a subsequent Supreme Court order that effectively dismissed the appeal and permitted withdrawal, leading to the dismissal of the writ applications.

What did the court decide?

The writ applications were dismissed as they no longer survived in view of the Supreme Court's order disposing of the related special leave petition.

Mohammad Anwar Jawed Vs the State of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9755 of 2012

¶2

====================================================== 1. Amit Kumar Singh S/O Abhimanyu Singh Resident Of VillageMarpamohan, P.O- Deokulia, P.S- Phenhara, District- East Champarant At Motihari.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

¶5

The Principal Secretary Personnel And Administrative Reform Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Deputy Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Reform Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 6. The District Establishment Compassionate Committee, East Champaran Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate- East Champaran (Motihari) 7. The District Education Officer, East Champaran (Motihari)

¶6

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9719 of 2012

¶7

====================================================== 1. Mohammad Anwar Jawed Son Of Late Mujabir Rahman Resident Of Village - Gauwandhitola, Pokhari, P.O.- Ibrahimpur Parsauni, P.S.Phenhara, District - East Champaran (Motihari)

¶8

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶9

The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Principal Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Reform Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 5. The Deputy Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 6. The District Establishment Compassionate Committee, East Champarannn Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate East Champaran (Motihari)

¶10

The District Education Officer, East Champaran (Motihari)

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : (In CWJC No.9755 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh

¶13

Patna High Court CWJC No.9755 of 2012 (3) dt.07-12-2012

¶14

¶15

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amar Nath Deo Sc26 (In CWJC No.9719 of 2012) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.S. Shabbar Hussain Gp4

¶16

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 07-12-2012

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶19

State.

¶20

The issue involved in the present application stands covered by Full Bench judgment reported in 2010 (3) P.L.J.R. 294 (State of Bihar vs. Rajeev Ran Vijay Kumar) adverse to the petitioner.

¶21

The respondent before the Full Bench preferred S.L.P. (Civil) No.29655/10 which has been disposed on 26.11.2012 in the following terms:-

¶22

“Counsel for the respondent-State submits that if the petitioners withdraw this petition and move the authorities concerned, their cases shall be considered by the authorities concerned keeping in view the facts and circumstances of each case. In view of the above statement, petitioners are permitted to withdraw this special leave petition with liberty to move the authorities concerned who shall take a decision thereon expeditiously.

¶23

In view of the order passed above, the application for intervention does not survive and the same is dismissed.”

¶24

The writ applications are disposed in terms of the

¶25

orders of the Supreme Court.

¶26

(Navin Sinha, J)

¶27

K.C.jha/-

Mohammad Anwar Jawed v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Anwar Jawed v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Gopal Krishna Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Tapesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Md.Kalim Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Amit Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Amit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.