The petition was allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel on the ground that the writ application had become infructuous; the writ application was then dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5805 of 2006 (7) dt.04-09-2012
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5805 of 2006 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Satendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kumar, son of Sri Kamla Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla Shokpuri Colony, Takiyapar Danapur, P.S. Danapur, Distt.- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s |
|
| ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary Mr. Bishwa Bhushan Sahay |
|
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 7 04 |
-09-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ application has become infructuous. Hence, he prays to withdraw this application. |
| Prayer is allowed. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| Pradeep/- | (Jayanandan Singh, J) |
Satendra Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
