Disposed

Ram Bahadur Mandal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Dec 2012CWJC/18291/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court directed the respondents to ascertain if the petitioner is similarly situated to those in C.W.J.C. No. 10436 of 2012. If not similarly situated, a show cause notice and personal hearing must be granted before passing a reasoned order; otherwise, similar treatment is expected. The application was disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to grant show cause notice, personal hearing, and reasoned order if petitioner is not found similarly situated to previous order.

Ram Bahadur Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.18291 of 2012 (2) dt.17-12-2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18291 of 2012

¶3

====================================================== 1. Ram Bahadur Mandal S/O Late Ram Dhari Mandal Resident Of VillageTeknama, P.O- Dhabauli, Block- Patargarh, P.S- Sour Bazar, DistrictSaharsa.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Department Of Primary Education Government Of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Regional Deputy Director Of Education, Saharsa.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

¶10

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Saharsa. 7. The Drawing & Disbursing- Cum- Headmaster, Middle School, Patargarh, Saharsa. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Avnish Nandan Sinha Gp11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

2 17-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner is aggrieved by reduction of pay scale after retirement.

¶13

Reliance is placed on an order passed with regard to another similarly situated in C.W.J.C. No. 10436 of 2012.

¶14

Counsel for the State submits that the authorities may be permitted to examine if the petitioner was similarly situated in which he went he may be entitled to similar treatment.

¶15

If the respondents opine that the petitioner is not

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.18291 of 2012 (2) dt.17-12-2012

¶17

covered by the aforesaid order, they are required to give him a show cause notice mentioning the grounds for difference of opinion and the facts distinguishable why he was not entitled to the benefit of the order, grant him a personal hearing, and then pass a reasoned and speaking order which must necessarily discuss all issues reflecting due application of mind.

¶18

If the respondents find that the petitioner is similarly situated, they are expected to grant him similar treatment.

¶19

The order to be complied with within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order.

¶20

The application stands disposed.

¶21

(Navin Sinha, J.)

¶22

Md. Ibrarul/-

Ram Bahadur Mandal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bahadur Mandal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalawti Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Surya Narayan Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manjula Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Kumari Shobha Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Yogendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Vinay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.