A writ petitioner aggrieved by zero marks for 'capacity to provide infrastructure' was directed by the High Court to itself to allow the petitioner to raise such objection before any further action was taken.
Direction to the Corporation authority to consider the petitioner's objection and communicate it before taking further action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17454 of 2012
====================================================== Asif Hussain Khan, son of Sri Ashfaque Hussain Khan, resident of Lauwan, P.O.-Hardia, P.S.-Barhariya, District-Siwan.
From Annexure-7 and 8 it appears that the petitioner has already filed his objection before the senior officers of the Corporation.
In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the appropriate authority of the Corporation
Patna High Court CWJC No.17454 of 2012 (2) dt.18-09-2012
2 / 2
to consider the objection of the petitioner, dispose it of and communicate it to him before taking any further action in the matter.
Arvind/-
(Jayanandan Singh, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court ought to intervene to direct the petitioner to consider the objection regarding zero marks allotted under capacity to provide infrastructure and facility.
Asif Hussain Khan
The Union of India
The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
