Oral order disposing of a compromise order. A joint application filed by petitioners and respondents admitted compromise led to the disposal of both the main writ petition and the interlocutory application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16772 of 2011
======================================================
Both are residents of Village- Kateya, Post Office- Kateya, Police Station- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.
....Plaintiffs .... Petitioner/s
Versus
…Intervenor ……….Respondent.
3(c) Rinku Kumari (daughter)
All are residents of Village- Kateya, Post Office- Kateya, Police Station- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.
……Defendants……Respondents. 4. Vijay Kumar Chaubey, son of late Mohan Chaubey, resident of VillageKateya, Post Office- Kateya, Police Station- Kateya, DistrictGopalganj. 5. Most. Sushila Kuer, W/o late Rama Pandey, resident of VillageChaintola, Imelia, P.S.-_ Kateya, District- Gopalganj.
....Plaintiff .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nagendra Rai
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
14 05-10-2012
Re: I.A. No.6710 of 2012:
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been
filed jointly on behalf of the petitioners and the respondents
admitting on affidavit that the matter has been compromised
between the parties and that the writ application may
Patna High Court CWJC No.16772 of 2011 (14) dt.05-10-2012
2
accordingly be disposed of. The position is not being contested by Mr. Nagendra Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
In view of the submissions taken note of and the statements made in the interlocutory application, both the writ petition as well as the interlocutory application stands disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
SKPathak/-
Umapati Kuer
Dharamshila Kumari
Subhash Chaubey
Ganesh Prasad
Vijay Kumar Chaubey
Most. Sushila Kuer
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
