The Patna High Court permitted the petitioner to convert the pending application into one under Article 227 read with 2010(2)PLJR 954 within six weeks and disposed of the I.A.
Permission to convert the present application into an application under Article 227 within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.R. No.119 of 2012 (4) dt.05-10-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.119 of 2012
====================================================== Prakash @ Prakash Pd. Narayan Sinha .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Smt. Asha Mishra & Anr. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 04. 05-10-2012 In view of the judicial pronouncement reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954 (Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar) and considering the relief prayed in the present application, learned counsel is permitted to convert the present application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within a period of six weeks’ from today. I.A. No. 5788 of 2012 stands disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
S.Sb/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to convert the present application into one under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar PoddarReferred¶3
2010(2) PLJR 954 (Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash @ Prakash Pd. Narayan Sinha
Smt. Asha Mishra & Anr.
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
