Seva Bharti v. the Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel who had no inputs or instructions on the issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14089 of 2005
====================================================== Seva Bharti, through its Chairman, Ashok Kumar Singh, having its Regd. Office at 17A, Srinagar Colony, P O & P S – Gulzarbagh, Town & District – Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Union of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee For the Union of India :: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey(C.G.C.) For the State : Mr. (SC 1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 6 15-10-2012 Counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that he has no inputs or instruction on the issue. In view of the same writ is dismissed as not pressed. Counsels for the respondents are present.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
R.K.Pathak/-
Seva Bharti
The Union of India
Ors
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court