In a disposed writ application, the court noted the respondent Manager had accepted rent from the petitioner. Finding no dispute at that stage, the writ was disposed of ex parte without any detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13637 of 2008 ====================================================== Ramavtar Sharma, son of late Ram Sharma, resident of Lal Bazar, Ward No.20 (1) 1/a. P O – Bettiah, P S – Town, District – East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran. 3. Manager, Bettiah Raj Estate. 4. The Circle Officer, Bettiah. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anwar Karim @ Anwar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (AAG8) ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 3 16-10-2012 There are some happy developments during the pendency of the writ application, in the sense that the respondent Manager, Bettiah Raj has accepted rent from the petitioner. If that be so, petitioner does not want to press the matter any further at this stage. Writ is disposed of in terms of the above.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
R.K.Pathak/-
Ramavtar Sharma
The State of Bihar
The Collector cum District Magistrate, Bettiah
The Manager, Bettiah Raj Estate
The Circle Officer, Bettiah
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
